CCAFS is working together with International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) to identify low emissions agricultural pathways and priorities for climate change mitigation in agricultural landscapes using integrated assessment modelling (the Global Biosphere Management Model (GLOBIOM) and scenarios.
In 2013 and 2014, the project focused on calculating the extent of agricultural mitigation necessary in developing countries and the effect of selected emissions floors on meeting future climate target thresholds. In 2015, the team conducted a spatial analysis of mitigation priorities globally for selected policy pathways. In 2015 and 2016, the project determined a target for agricultural mitigation and assessing the necessity of mitigation globally and regionally in the agriculture sector.
All results serve as resources for national decision-making and investment in appropriate LED pathways and agricultural development.
Outcomes and impact
The most significant sources of GHG emissions and mitigation potentials (considering carbon removals and avoided future emissions) from agriculture and land-use sectors have been identified. However, in many cases the impact of low emissions development (LED) on food production, livelihoods and equity – in short on trade-offs – is still being studied. This project informs decision-makers to ensure that LED is achieved while protecting food security and livelihoods and increasing gender equity.
The project contributed to development of a new set of scenarios along the Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs) and the GHG mitigation dimension represented by the Representative Concentration Pathways (Fricko et al. 2016). These scenarios show the role agriculture has to play in climate change stabilization, and they are likely to become the backbone of the climate assessments for the next decades. Related results show that, at least in the medium term, the effects of GHG mitigation could be worse in terms of food availability than the effects of climate change itself if policies are not carefully designed.
The project examined mitigation potentials in agricultural sector and which policies could avoid the trade-offs between climate change mitigation and food availability. Policy makers will find useful information about which mitigation options have the largest economic mitigation potential in which region. International negotiations will benefit from the insights in country typology which in particular allows to identify countries key to influencing global climate change. Finally, soil organic carbon sequestration as a win-win-win option of the climate smart agriculture has been assessed again in view of its potential to reduce the trade-offs between mitigation and development. These insights allow for a more balanced consideration of the agricultural sector in future international climate agreements and in the design of national policies.
The modeling community is benefitting from the new detailed marginal abatement cost curves, which have been developed covering all three important mitigation wedges - technological solutions, structural change and demand side adjustments – in a consistent way.
Havlik P, Valin H, Husti M, Schmid E, Leclere D, Forsell N, Herrero M, Khabarov N, Mosnier A, Cantele M, Obersteiner M. 2015. Climate change impacts and mitigation in the developing world: an integrated assessment of the agriculture and forestry sectors. Policy Research Working Paper 7477. Washington DC: World Bank.
Herrero M, Henderson B, Havlik P, Thornton PK, Conant RT, Smith P, Wirsenius S, Hristov AN, Gerber P, Gill M, Butterbach-Bahl K, Valin H, Garnett T, Stehfest E. 2016. Greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the livestock sector. Nature Climate Change 9(5): 452–461.
Kleinwechter U, Levesque A, Havlík P, Forsell N, Zhang Y, Fricko O, Obersteiner M. 2015. Global food efficiency of climate change mitigation in agriculture. Abstract for the International Conference of Agricultural Economists, August 8-14, Milao, Italy.
Levesque, A. 2014. Climate regime, AFOLU mitigation and carbon-food efficiency. M.Sc. Thesis, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense, Master Economie du Développement Durable, de l’Energie et de l’Environnement, 2013-1024
Wollenberg E, Richards M, Smith P, Havlík P, Obersteiner M et al. 2016. Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2°C target. Global Change Biology, 22 (12). pp. 3859-3864.
The project team consists of IIASA and CCAFS and also received support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) from October 2015-December 2016.
Considerations and analysis of LED trade-offs and benefits involving protection and growth of food security and livelihoods include gender.
Julianna White: firstname.lastname@example.org