What’s the verdict on chemical fertilisers?
Caity Peterson(International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) )
The giant neem tree that grows at the southeastern corner of Yorwataafaa’s house in Bompari village has seen its share of negotiations. Yorwataafaa is the chief of Bompari, in the Upper West region of Ghana, and his tree serves as the meeting place for all community business. Its umbrella-like branches are the only effective respite from the brutal sun, creating a sanctuary for thought, discussion and decision.
When talking about climate-smart agriculture - practices that improve food security and adaptation to climate change while being mindful of mitigation - chemical or synthetic fertilisers are often cast as the villain for their contribution to agricultural emissions.
Ongoing research from the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) is taking a look at fertiliser application options and putting them to the test. Just how climate-smart are they from the farmers’ perspective, and what might be preventing their adoption in places like Bompari village?
To read the full story, visit the Thomson Reuters Foundation blog.
Caity Peterson is a visiting researcher based at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) in Colombia, working in the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).
